Criminalization of Freedom of Assembly in Indonesia
Keywords:
Criminalization, Freedom, Social Organization
Abstract
This study aims to analyze Law No. 16 of 2017 concerning Social Organizations in accordance with the Rule of Law Principles and find forms of formulative policies to revoke the status of Legal Entities of Community Organizations Association in the future (Ius Constituendum). This research is a normative legal research using 3 types of approaches: Statute Approach, Conceptual Approach, Case Approach related to the laws and regulations on Social Organizations. The results of this study indicate that Law No. 16 of 2017, which criminalizes freedom of assembly is not following the principles of the state law and even against the principles of the state law, and has the potential to lead to repressive actions to create a dictatorial ruler. Future formulative policies in realizing freedom of association and assembly, the Law on Community Organizations must continue to guarantee a fair judicial process (due process of law) as regulated in Law Number 17 of 2013 concerning Social Organizations, and the sanctions given are sufficient sanctions. Administratively by suspending or revoking the status of a legal entity association or suspending or dissolving community organizations.
References
Arief, B. N. (No year). Criminal law politics lecture material. Handout. Postgraduate Program in Law Doctoral Program at Diponegoro University. Semarang.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). The idea of the state law. Retrieved from http://rikosyahrudin.blogspot.com/2014/11/gagasan-negara- Hukum-indonesia-oleh.html.
Awaluddin. (2014). The existence of the national police commission in the state administration system of the republic of Indonesia(Dissertation Summary), Hasanuddin University. Makassar: PDIH FH Unhas.
Azhar. (1995). Indonesian state of l: Normative Juridical Analysis of Its Elements. Jakarta: UI Press.
Boentarman. (1961). Thoughts on the state and law in the 19th century. Jakarta: PT Pembangunan.
Dicey, A. V. (1979). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. London: Macmillan Press.
DSVoll, W. (2013). Fundamentals of state administrative law. Jakarta: Print.First.Ray Graphics.
EL-Muhtaj, M. (2005). Human rights in the indonesian constitution, from the 1945 constitution to the amendments to the 1945 constitution of 2002. Jakarta: Kencana Publisher.
Elnizar, N. E. (2017). Voices of concern over perppu community organization come from campus. Retrieved from http://www. Hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt59781e5239397/voice-keprihatinan-atas-perppu-community organization-hasil-dari-kampus.
Erdianto, C. (2017). According to Jimly: there are two things that need to be revised in the community organization law. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/11/02/07465541/menurut-jimly-ada-dua-hal-yang-perlu-direvisi-pada-uu-community organization.
Erdianto, C. (2017). Three provisions in the community organization law are deemed to be in need of revision. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/10/26/07510631/tiga.-unjuk-dalam-uu-community organization-ini-dinilai-perlu-direvisi.
Erdianto, K. (2017). HTI: We were never given a warning letter by the government. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/05/08/18444851/hti.kami.no.pernah.diberi.surat.peringatan.by.government.
Frankfurter, J. F. (1995). United States of America Supreme Court.
Hayek, F. A. (2011). The constitution of liberty, the definitive edition, ed. Ronald Hamowy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ismail, R. A. (2019). Problematikan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Organisasi Masyarakat. Mulawarman Law Review. 4(1), 1-12.
Khasanofa, A. (2017). Kedudukan Perppu Ormas Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Reflik. Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. 5(2),128-140.
Kurniawan, M. B. (2018). Konstitusionalitas Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Ormas Ditinjau dari UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi.Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 15(3) 455-479.
Latifah, M. (2020) Pelindungan HAM dalam Mekanisme Pembubaran Ormas Berbadan Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2017.Jurnal Negara Hukum, Jurnal Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.11(1),83-103.
Latipulhayat, A. (2017). Due Process of Law (editorial). Padjajaran Journal of Legal Studies (PJIH). 4(2).2017.
Lubis, T. M. (1999). The Rechtsstaat and Human Rights”, in Timothy Lindsey (ed), Indonesia: Law and Society Leichhard: The Federation Press.
Luthan, S. (1999). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dalam Hukum Pidana, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.1-13
Luthan, S. (2009). Asas dan Kriteria Kriminalisasi, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta. 16(1),1-17
Muslimin, M. (2018). Ide Kriminalisasi Negara Terhadap Pembiaran Kejahatan pada Kemerdekaan Pers. Jurnal Ilmiah Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. 456-470.
Nadlir, M. (2017). This is the reason why the government did not issue sp to dissolve HTI. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/05/09/21132381/ini.alasan.government.tak.keluarkan.sp.untuk.bubarkan.hti.
Nasrullah, Y. G. (2017). Impartial: some articles of the law on mass organizations are very dangerous; Important revised. Retrieved from https://www.hidayatullah.com/berita/nasional/read/2017/11/23/128689/imparsial-multiple-pasal-uu-community organization-very-dangerous-penting-direvisi.html.
Pratiwi, D. K,. (2017). Implikasi Yuridis Peraturan Pemerintah Penggan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Law.UNPAD Bandung, 4(2),281-297.
Ridwan, J., & Sudrajat, A. S. (2010). State administration law and public service policy. Bandung: Shades.
Ruslan, A.( 2005). Formation of legislation and quality of legal products.(Dissertation Summary). Makassar: Graduate Program, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University.
Salim, C. (2018). Problematika Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (PERPPU) No. 02 Tahun 2017 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (Studi Ormas Islam di Kota Metro). Istinbath Jurnal Hukum IANIN Metro. 15 (2), 309-336.
Sham, F. (2009). Design of analysis and evaluation of the tenang law of social organizations (UU. No. 8 of 1985). Retrieved from https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/organization_kejuangaan.pdf. Jakarta: National Legal Development Agency (BPHN).
Suteki, (2018). Urgensi Transpormasi Pemerintahan Demokrasi Menuju Pemerintahan Islam. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam (JKPIs). 1(1), 28-34.
Suwardiman. (2008). The public still doubts the actualization of pancasila. Jakarta: Compass Research and Development.
Syahrul, M., (2021).Studi Komparatif Undang-Undang Ormas dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Shautuna Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab UIN Alauddin Makassar. 2(3), 780-795.
Trinanda, D. (2020). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Perppu Ormas (Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Perspektif Siyasah Syariyyah). Jurnal Ijtihad. jurnal Fakultas Syari'ah Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, 36(2),91-102
Wikipedia. (2018) . Retrieved from https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keadaan_emergency.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). The idea of the state law. Retrieved from http://rikosyahrudin.blogspot.com/2014/11/gagasan-negara- Hukum-indonesia-oleh.html.
Awaluddin. (2014). The existence of the national police commission in the state administration system of the republic of Indonesia(Dissertation Summary), Hasanuddin University. Makassar: PDIH FH Unhas.
Azhar. (1995). Indonesian state of l: Normative Juridical Analysis of Its Elements. Jakarta: UI Press.
Boentarman. (1961). Thoughts on the state and law in the 19th century. Jakarta: PT Pembangunan.
Dicey, A. V. (1979). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. London: Macmillan Press.
DSVoll, W. (2013). Fundamentals of state administrative law. Jakarta: Print.First.Ray Graphics.
EL-Muhtaj, M. (2005). Human rights in the indonesian constitution, from the 1945 constitution to the amendments to the 1945 constitution of 2002. Jakarta: Kencana Publisher.
Elnizar, N. E. (2017). Voices of concern over perppu community organization come from campus. Retrieved from http://www. Hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt59781e5239397/voice-keprihatinan-atas-perppu-community organization-hasil-dari-kampus.
Erdianto, C. (2017). According to Jimly: there are two things that need to be revised in the community organization law. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/11/02/07465541/menurut-jimly-ada-dua-hal-yang-perlu-direvisi-pada-uu-community organization.
Erdianto, C. (2017). Three provisions in the community organization law are deemed to be in need of revision. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/10/26/07510631/tiga.-unjuk-dalam-uu-community organization-ini-dinilai-perlu-direvisi.
Erdianto, K. (2017). HTI: We were never given a warning letter by the government. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/05/08/18444851/hti.kami.no.pernah.diberi.surat.peringatan.by.government.
Frankfurter, J. F. (1995). United States of America Supreme Court.
Hayek, F. A. (2011). The constitution of liberty, the definitive edition, ed. Ronald Hamowy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ismail, R. A. (2019). Problematikan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Organisasi Masyarakat. Mulawarman Law Review. 4(1), 1-12.
Khasanofa, A. (2017). Kedudukan Perppu Ormas Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Reflik. Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. 5(2),128-140.
Kurniawan, M. B. (2018). Konstitusionalitas Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Ormas Ditinjau dari UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi.Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 15(3) 455-479.
Latifah, M. (2020) Pelindungan HAM dalam Mekanisme Pembubaran Ormas Berbadan Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2017.Jurnal Negara Hukum, Jurnal Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.11(1),83-103.
Latipulhayat, A. (2017). Due Process of Law (editorial). Padjajaran Journal of Legal Studies (PJIH). 4(2).2017.
Lubis, T. M. (1999). The Rechtsstaat and Human Rights”, in Timothy Lindsey (ed), Indonesia: Law and Society Leichhard: The Federation Press.
Luthan, S. (1999). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dalam Hukum Pidana, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.1-13
Luthan, S. (2009). Asas dan Kriteria Kriminalisasi, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta. 16(1),1-17
Muslimin, M. (2018). Ide Kriminalisasi Negara Terhadap Pembiaran Kejahatan pada Kemerdekaan Pers. Jurnal Ilmiah Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. 456-470.
Nadlir, M. (2017). This is the reason why the government did not issue sp to dissolve HTI. Retrieved from https://national.kompas.com/read/2017/05/09/21132381/ini.alasan.government.tak.keluarkan.sp.untuk.bubarkan.hti.
Nasrullah, Y. G. (2017). Impartial: some articles of the law on mass organizations are very dangerous; Important revised. Retrieved from https://www.hidayatullah.com/berita/nasional/read/2017/11/23/128689/imparsial-multiple-pasal-uu-community organization-very-dangerous-penting-direvisi.html.
Pratiwi, D. K,. (2017). Implikasi Yuridis Peraturan Pemerintah Penggan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Law.UNPAD Bandung, 4(2),281-297.
Ridwan, J., & Sudrajat, A. S. (2010). State administration law and public service policy. Bandung: Shades.
Ruslan, A.( 2005). Formation of legislation and quality of legal products.(Dissertation Summary). Makassar: Graduate Program, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University.
Salim, C. (2018). Problematika Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (PERPPU) No. 02 Tahun 2017 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (Studi Ormas Islam di Kota Metro). Istinbath Jurnal Hukum IANIN Metro. 15 (2), 309-336.
Sham, F. (2009). Design of analysis and evaluation of the tenang law of social organizations (UU. No. 8 of 1985). Retrieved from https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/organization_kejuangaan.pdf. Jakarta: National Legal Development Agency (BPHN).
Suteki, (2018). Urgensi Transpormasi Pemerintahan Demokrasi Menuju Pemerintahan Islam. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam (JKPIs). 1(1), 28-34.
Suwardiman. (2008). The public still doubts the actualization of pancasila. Jakarta: Compass Research and Development.
Syahrul, M., (2021).Studi Komparatif Undang-Undang Ormas dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Shautuna Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab UIN Alauddin Makassar. 2(3), 780-795.
Trinanda, D. (2020). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Perppu Ormas (Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Perspektif Siyasah Syariyyah). Jurnal Ijtihad. jurnal Fakultas Syari'ah Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, 36(2),91-102
Wikipedia. (2018) . Retrieved from https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keadaan_emergency.
Published
2023-06-17
How to Cite
Mispansyah, M., Nurunnisa, N., & Erniyati, T. (2023). Criminalization of Freedom of Assembly in Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, 6(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v6i2.192
Section
Islamic Politics, Law, and Governance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
- The Author and each co-authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution and ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors should sign copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by ISLAMIC RESEARCH prior the publication.
Author Guarantee
- The Author (Co-authors) guarantees that the Materials are an original work, submitted only to ISLAMIC RESEARCH, and have not been published previously.
- In case the Materials were written jointly with Co-authors, the Author guarantees that he/she has informed them of the terms of this Agreement and obtained their signatures or written permission to singe on their behalf.
- The Author guarantees as well that:
- The Materials do not contain libelous statements.
- The Materials do not infringe on other persons' rights (including without limitation copyrights, patent rights and the trademark right).
- The Materials do not contain facts or instructions that can cause damage or injury to third parties and their publication dose not cause the disclosure of any secret or confidential information
ISLAMIC RESEARCH is Published by Perhimpunan Intelektual Muslim Indonesia, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright ©2022.
